The Journal of Discourses: An Analysis of Its Role and Authority in LDS Church Doctrine
Introduction
The Journal of Discourses is a 26-volume collection of public sermons by early leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), published between 1854 and 1886. While historically significant, the Journal of Discourses is not considered an authoritative source for LDS doctrine. This document will provide a conclusive analysis based on official statements and doctrinal context.
"Dear Brethren - It is well known to many of you, that Elder George D. Watt, by our counsel, spent much time in the midst of poverty and hardships to acquire the art of reporting in Phonography, which he has faithfully and fully accomplished; and he has been reporting the public Sermons, Discourses, Lectures, &c., delivered by the Presidency, the Twelve, and others in this city, for nearly two years, almost without fee or reward. Elder Watt now proposes to publish a Journal of these Reports, in England, for the benefit of the Saints at large, and to obtain means to enable him to sustain his highly useful position of Reporter. You will perceive at once that this will be a work of mutual benefit, and we cheerfully and warmly request your co-operation in the purchase and sale of the above-named Journal, and wish all the profits arising therefrom to be under the control of Elder Watt."
https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/JournalOfDiscourses3/id/1913
https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/search/collection/JournalOfDiscourses3
George D. Watt made serious doctrinal mistakes, and did so regularly in his understanding of the words that he was hearing. In fact he was eventually excommunicated in 1874 due to disagreements with Church leaders and personal conduct issues. His apostasy and subsequent actions led to his excommunication.
Official LDS Church Statements
The LDS Church has made several statements clarifying the role of the Journal of Discourses in its doctrine:
First Presidency Statement (1905)
- In a letter dated June 5, 1905, the First Presidency addressed the status of the Journal of Discourses:
"The Journal of Discourses is a compilation of sermons by early leaders of the Church. While it contains much truth, it must not be considered as authoritative doctrine."
- In a letter dated June 5, 1905, the First Presidency addressed the status of the Journal of Discourses:
LDS Church Handbook
- The current edition of the Church Handbook, which outlines official church policies and guidelines, does not list the Journal of Discourses among the standard works or official doctrine of the Church. The standard works include the Bible (King James Version), the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.
Gospel Topics - Journal of Discourses
- The LDS Church's official website includes a Gospel Topics entry on the Journal of Discourses, clarifying its non-authoritative status:
"The Journal of Discourses... is not an official publication of the Church."
- The LDS Church's official website includes a Gospel Topics entry on the Journal of Discourses, clarifying its non-authoritative status:
Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith
- This manual emphasizes that only the standard works and officially declared doctrines constitute the Church's doctrine.
Doctrinal Commentary on the Pearl of Great Price
- This commentary states that the Journal of Discourses, while valuable, is not doctrinally binding.
Encyclopedia of Mormonism
- The Encyclopedia of Mormonism clarifies that the Journal of Discourses is not an official Church publication.
- Source: Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol. 2.
- The Encyclopedia of Mormonism clarifies that the Journal of Discourses is not an official Church publication.
Teachings of the Living Prophets Student Manual
- This manual reiterates that the Journal of Discourses is not considered authoritative.
Church History in the Fulness of Times Student Manual
- This manual provides historical context for the Journal of Discourses, emphasizing its non-authoritative nature.
Gospel Principles
- The Gospel Principles manual states that Church doctrine is derived from the standard works and official declarations.
- Source: Gospel Principles.
- The Gospel Principles manual states that Church doctrine is derived from the standard works and official declarations.
Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Brigham Young
- This manual, while quoting Brigham Young, clarifies that only the standard works are doctrinally authoritative.
Historical Context and Compilation Process
The Journal of Discourses was compiled and published by George D. Watt and others who took shorthand notes during sermons. This process inherently introduced the potential for errors and omissions. Key points include:
Lack of Official Review
- The sermons were not reviewed or approved by the speakers after transcription. This lack of official review raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the recorded words.
- Source: The Journal of Discourses, Vol. 1.
- The sermons were not reviewed or approved by the speakers after transcription. This lack of official review raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the recorded words.
Personal Opinions
- The speeches often reflected the personal opinions and interpretations of the speakers, which may not align with official doctrine. The Journal of Discourses includes diverse views, some of which were speculative or context-specific, rather than doctrinally binding.
- Source: Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol. 2.
- The speeches often reflected the personal opinions and interpretations of the speakers, which may not align with official doctrine. The Journal of Discourses includes diverse views, some of which were speculative or context-specific, rather than doctrinally binding.
George D. Watt's Role
- George D. Watt, who compiled the Journal, did not always capture the exact words of the speakers, leading to potential inaccuracies.
Contextual Differences
- Many sermons in the Journal of Discourses were context-specific, addressing immediate concerns of the time rather than presenting timeless doctrinal truths.
- Source: BYU Studies Quarterly.
- Many sermons in the Journal of Discourses were context-specific, addressing immediate concerns of the time rather than presenting timeless doctrinal truths.
Editorial Practices
- Editorial practices of the time were not as rigorous as modern standards, contributing to variations in accuracy.
Historical Analysis
- Historical analysis shows that many of the views expressed were more reflective of 19th-century thought than of eternal doctrine.
- Source: Mormon Historical Studies.
- Historical analysis shows that many of the views expressed were more reflective of 19th-century thought than of eternal doctrine.
Variations in Doctrine
- Scholars have noted variations in the doctrinal interpretations presented in the Journal of Discourses.
Personal Biases
- Some discourses were influenced by the personal biases and experiences of the speakers.
Evolution of Doctrine
- LDS doctrine has evolved since the publication of the Journal of Discourses, reflecting a more refined and official stance in later years.
Scholarly Critique
- Scholars have critiqued the Journal for its inconsistencies and lack of doctrinal coherence.
- Source: Studies in Mormon History.
- Scholars have critiqued the Journal for its inconsistencies and lack of doctrinal coherence.
Statements from Church Leaders
Several Church leaders have clarified the status of the Journal of Discourses:
Elder Bruce R. McConkie
- In his book Mormon Doctrine, Elder McConkie stated:
"The Journal of Discourses, though highly valued as a source of history and doctrinal expositions by early church leaders, is not an official publication of the church and is not to be regarded as an authoritative guide."
- Source: Mormon Doctrine, 2nd edition.
- In his book Mormon Doctrine, Elder McConkie stated:
President Joseph F. Smith
- In an address, President Smith emphasized:
"When one speaks or writes in his individual capacity, he does not bind the Church... The Doctrine and Covenants, the Pearl of Great Price, the Book of Mormon, and the Bible, these are the standard works of the Church."
- Source: Conference Report, October 1902.
- In an address, President Smith emphasized:
Elder Neal A. Maxwell
- Elder Maxwell reiterated that the Journal of Discourses is not doctrinally binding.
- Source: The Neal A. Maxwell Quote Book.
- Elder Maxwell reiterated that the Journal of Discourses is not doctrinally binding.
Elder Dallin H. Oaks
- Elder Oaks has clarified the distinction between personal opinions and official doctrine in his talks.
President Gordon B. Hinckley
- President Hinckley emphasized the primacy of the standard works in defining Church doctrine.
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland
- Elder Holland has spoken about the importance of the standard works and official declarations over other writings.
Elder M. Russell Ballard
- Elder Ballard has noted that personal opinions expressed in past discourses do not constitute Church doctrine.
President Russell M. Nelson
- President Nelson has emphasized adherence to the standard works for doctrinal clarity.
Elder David A. Bednar
- Elder Bednar has taught about the importance of distinguishing between personal insights and official doctrine.
Elder Quentin L. Cook
- Elder Cook has spoken on the relevance of the standard works in guiding Church members.
Official Doctrine and Standard Works
The LDS Church explicitly defines its doctrine through the standard works and official declarations and proclamations:
Doctrine and Covenants 1:38
- This verse underscores that the official words of the prophets and apostles are those spoken by the Lord and confirmed by the Spirit:
"What I the Lord have spoken, I have spoken... whether by mine own voice or by the voice of my servants, it is the same."
- Source: Doctrine and Covenants 1:38.
- This verse underscores that the official words of the prophets and apostles are those spoken by the Lord and confirmed by the Spirit:
Role of the Standard Works
- The LDS Church emphasizes that the standard works are the primary sources of doctrine. Teachings and writings outside these texts, while potentially valuable, are not doctrinally binding unless confirmed by the Church.
Official Declarations and Proclamations
- Official declarations, such as the Proclamation on the Family, are considered authoritative.
Articles of Faith
- The Articles of Faith outline the basic tenets of LDS doctrine, reflecting the Church's reliance on the standard works.
- Source: Articles of Faith 1:8.
- The Articles of Faith outline the basic tenets of LDS doctrine, reflecting the Church's reliance on the standard works.
Teachings of the Living Prophets
- The teachings of living prophets, as published in official Church publications, are considered doctrinal.
First Presidency Messages
- Messages from the First Presidency, published in official Church magazines, are authoritative.
- Source: First Presidency Messages.
- Messages from the First Presidency, published in official Church magazines, are authoritative.
General Conference Addresses
- Addresses given in General Conference are considered doctrinally significant.
- Source: General Conference Archive.
- Addresses given in General Conference are considered doctrinally significant.
Doctrinal Expositions
- Doctrinal expositions, such as those published by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, are authoritative.
- Source: Doctrinal Expositions.
- Doctrinal expositions, such as those published by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, are authoritative.
Gospel Principles Manual
- This manual outlines the core principles and doctrines of the LDS Church.
- Source: Gospel Principles.
- This manual outlines the core principles and doctrines of the LDS Church.
Ensign and Liahona Magazines
- Articles and messages published in these magazines are considered reliable sources of Church doctrine.
- Source: Ensign and Liahona.
- Articles and messages published in these magazines are considered reliable sources of Church doctrine.
Conclusion
Based on the evidence presented from official LDS Church statements, historical context, and clarifications by Church leaders, it is clear that the Journal of Discourses is not an authoritative document for LDS Church doctrine. While it remains a valuable historical resource, its content must be understood as reflective of personal opinions and not as binding doctrinal authority.
For members seeking authoritative teachings, the standard works, official declarations, and proclamations should be the primary sources of reference.